# Improved performance

**URL:** <https://forum.tiledb.com/t/improved-performance/291>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [December 26, 2020, 8:46pm UTC](https://forum.tiledb.com/t/improved-performance/291 "2020-12-26T20:46:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![qiuwei](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/forum.tiledb.com/qiuwei/32/80_2.png) [@qiuwei](https://forum.tiledb.com/u/qiuwei)\
**Post date:** [December 28, 2020, 6:46am UTC](https://forum.tiledb.com/t/improved-performance/291/2 "2020-12-28T06:46:01Z")

</div>

@Mtrl_Scientist

Excellent!

By using the parameters you provided, I could reduce the reading time in my benchmark([Benchmarking tiledb read performance](https://forum.tiledb.com/t/benchmarking-tiledb-read-performance/278/3)) from ~16s to ~8s, only slower than parquet by a very small margin.

Thanks for the tip!

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.tiledb.com/t/improved-performance/291)._